Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers
Friday, November 06, 2009
|
|
A CAN’T MISS FORMULA FOR VICTORY
|
|
Posted by:
Michael Medved at
2:59 PM
|
The recent GOP triumphs in gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey provide a resounding rebuttal to those who claim Republicans can win simply by mobilizing their conservative base. In New Jersey, self-described conservatives amounted to just 30 percent of the electorate and in Virginia only 39 percent. Obviously, if the two candidates appealed solely to those who considered themselves conservative, they would have lost in twin landslides. Instead, they reached out to self-identified moderates—the biggest group in both states. Chris Christie, newly elected Republican governor of New Jersey got 48 percent of the moderate vote, and Bob McDonnell, the big winner in Virginia, got 46 percent of the mod squad. When Republican candidates rally their fellow conservatives, and supplement those votes by at least splitting those who see themselves as moderate, it’s a can’t-miss formula for victory.
|
|
|
Friday, November 06, 2009
|
|
THIS Doesn't Fit the Narrative!
|
|
Posted by:
Carol Platt Liebau at
12:18 PM
|
In the wake of their electoral debacle last Tuesday, lefties like Eric Alterman insist that their partisans have reason to smile, because of ideological divisions in the Republican party.
But wait a minute. Byron York reports this morning that MoveOn.org is raising money to attack moderate Democrats who decline to toe the party line when it comes to health care. How strange that the MSM has been focused so exclusively on Republican internecine warfare, no?!
If anything, I'd rather be dealing with the divisions within the Republican Party. At this point, they're centered around issues that are largely popular with the public, like how much to reduce the size of government, how best to restore jobs, how best to resist the Obama State's mulitple incursions on personal liberty. Dede Scozzafava -- the nominally Republican candidate in NY-23 -- was so far outside even the Republican "big tent" that anyone who actually agrees with her on the issues can't be classified as anything but a Democrat.
In contrast, the Democrat internecine fighting is focused on an issue that is deeply unpopular with Americans -- health care "reform." What's more, the members of the party who are under attack are, by and large, Democrats who just can't buck their moderate districts by supporting a bill the public hates on an issue that isn't voters' top priorities.
So the MSM chin-strokers and navel-gazers can revel in GOP disagreements all they want. I prefer them to the problems that the Democrats have.0 .
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Judge the person, not the resume
|
|
Posted by:
Michael Medved at
5:38 PM
|
(Appeared in USA Today, November 3, 2009)
‘A nation that proudly offers fresh starts and open doors regardless of old world titles or family connections should reject snobbery based on either academic attainment or aristocratic ancestry.’ The poisonous polarization of the culture has produced some ill-considered attacks that call into question one of the most fundamental American values: the notion that each individual deserves to be judged on ability, not background, and evaluated on performance rather than credentials. For instance, some of the pre-emptive dismissal of Sarah Palin's upcoming book Going Rogue — with its massive first printing of 1.5 million — represents an elitist attempt to disarm a political combatant by questioning her qualifications. Echoing themes from the 2008 campaign, the former governor's many detractors focus contemptuous attention on her teenage participation in beauty pageants, youthful ambitions as a sportscaster and checkered academic career (transferring among four colleges before finally finishing a journalism degree at the University of Idaho). Some of the nation's most influential commentators face similarly sneering criticism based on educational background. I recently received an angry letter from a Texas teacher who despised all of conservative talk radio. "You're a pathetic joke, just like all the other professional blowhards who pollute the airwaves with their rants," he cheerfully opined. "Look at the biggest clowns in your business Limbaugh, Hannity, Glenn Beck. How many college degrees among all of them? The answer is zero. You're just a bunch of ignorant boobs who think that if you shout loud enough no one will notice you have nothing to say." It's true that my colleagues Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck all failed to earn university degrees, but they've won huge audiences based on undeniable skill as persuasive communicators. For those who are entertained, provoked or inspired by an opinionated figure on radio or TV, academic distinction is entirely irrelevant. Cronkite, Novak, Safire The public recently mourned the loss of three universally respected journalists — Walter Cronkite, Robert Novak and William Safire. No one questioned their brilliance, or their contributions to the culture, despite the fact that they all dropped out of college short of graduation. By the same token, sophisticated computer geeks may feel disdainful of Microsoft products, but they don't boycott that company because Bill Gates left Harvard without earning a degree. Cronkite, Novak and Safire rose to fame in an earlier era, when far fewer Americans graduated from college. In 1960, only 8% of adults 25 or older had earned university degrees. Today, the percentage of college graduates is nearing a third of all adults. In the election of 1948, the voters paid scant attention to the fact that President Truman never attended college. But today, with college education far more common and accessible, no politician could run a credible presidential campaign without some post-high school diploma. Ironically, the emphasis on intellectual elitism has become far more pronounced on the left than the right, despite the long-standing association of Democrats as "the party of the people." In 2008, college graduates voted decisively for Obama, and he won even bigger majorities of those with post-graduate degrees — not surprising for a candidate with credentials from Columbia and Harvard. Not only do studies indicate a considerable liberal tilt in college faculties, but Democrats support increased government spending for institutions of higher learning. Because progressives attach greater significance to universities, it makes sense that they judge the educational backgrounds of candidates (and commentators) accordingly: In the past six presidential elections, every one of the Democratic nominees held degrees from Harvard or Yale. This liberal infatuation with Ivy League affiliation, going back to the Harvard-trained Roosevelt and Kennedy families, also protects prominent progressives from doubts about their "unserious" early careers. Conservatives note that Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., spent most of adulthood as a comedian,or that New York Times columnist Frank Rich was a drama critic, or that MSNBC firebrand Keith Olbermann gained fame as a sportscaster. Liberals respond to such objections by insisting that whatever previous professional paths, their stars boast solid academic qualifications: Franken and Rich graduated from Harvard, and Olbermann got a degree from Cornell. Illogical attacks In that context, I've received personal attacks because of the 12 years I spent as a full-time film critic (reviewing movies for PBS and the New York Post) before launching my daily political talk show 13 years ago. The same correspondent who objected to the prominence of Limbaugh and company because of their lack of university diplomas suggested that my books and radio commentary deserved no attention because "you're a dummy movie critic with no qualifications at all." As a matter of record, I graduated from Yale with honors and attended Yale Law School, before working as speechwriter and campaign aide for senatorial and congressional candidates, and writing an acclaimed history of the White House staff. Of course, these achievements will do nothing to help my latest book if it's inarticulate or unpersuasive, just as Sarah Palin's early life struggles should in no way discredit her best-seller if it's riveting and insightful. Attempts to disregard messages by attacking the background of the messenger count as not only illogical but also un-American. A nation that proudly offers fresh starts and open doors regardless of old world titles or family connections should reject snobbery based on either academic attainment or aristocratic ancestry. For Palin, as for any candidate or commentator, the public will appropriately judge performance, not personal history, and should by all means read the book, not the r?sum?. Michael Medved, a member of USA TODAY's board of contributors, hosts a daily radio talk show and is the author of 12 books, including The Shadow Presidents and the forthcoming The 5 Big Lies About American Business.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Bumbling "Put Up" Time
|
|
Posted by:
Carol Platt Liebau at
5:02 PM
|
In the wake of Tuesday's elections, it's never been more clear that "put up or shut up" time is rapidly approaching for the President. The Right, of course, is opposed to him. And now, even some of the Left is getting sick of his all-celebrity, no-leadership model of governing.
It seems to me that if the President were half as smart as we've been told he is, he'd realize that he needs to step up. And if he were half as unflappable as we've been told he is, he wouldn't be doing stuff like this in the wake of the election: That's right, he's complaining again about the "mess" he inheirited from the Bush administration.
So you've got a delusional Speaker of the House, trying harder than ever to ram through a massively unpopular monstrosity of a health care bill, even though disgruntled voters list health care low on their list of concerns. You've got an electorally embattled Senate majority leader delaying bringing any bill to the Senate floor.
So there would seem to be plenty for the President to do, besides whine about the troubles he inheirited. More than ever, he should be projecting calmness, capability and the ability to engage in meaningful action. Instead, more than ever, he's contributing to the sense that he's not quite up to the job that he won with so little experience.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Who Needs A Bigger Tent, Anyway?
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
11:02 AM
|
Re: Divided Electorate..... Instead of a lack of Republicans showing up in 2008, what if we focused on Democrats not showing up on Tuesday? That's the point Rush made yesterday:
So I guess we could say here that there's a civil war brewing in the Democrat Party and they need to go more in the middle. The Democrat Party needs a bigger tent! The Democrat Party needs moderates! The Democrat Party needs to expand it's base! Everything that they are saying from a template about us on the Republican side we could turn right around and smack 'em with.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Bachmann's Rally Today
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
9:58 AM
|
Rep. Michelle Bachmann, (R-Minn.) is staging a march on Washington today... kind of. Pelosi's health care bill is flying through the Senate, and she thinks its the only way to stop it is through the power of the people.
It's like the 9/12 March On Washington... only slightly more impromptu.
So go to the West steps of the Capitol today at noon and yell at your member of Congress for a while. Go ahead. Try it. It feels great.
And if you can't be in D.C., go to your local district offices at the same time. Tell them you're fed up. If you can't get to a local office, send an email to your local representative right at noon. Do something.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Huffington Post on Obama's Broken Promises
|
|
Posted by:
John Hanlon at
6:30 AM
|
As an anniversary present for the first anniversay of Barack Obama being elected the 44th president of the United States, the liberal Huffington Post recently compiled a list of ten major promises that Obama broke or did not follow up on...
This list attests to the disappointment that liberals continue to feel over one year after they helped to elect the candidate who believed in "the audacity of hope".
Click here to check it out.
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
|
|
Dave Weigel On NY-23
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
1:54 PM
|
His reporting isn't particularly friendly to conservatives, but it is very, very good:
Hours before the polls closed, Hoffman backers were echoing the pundits’ spin–this race would be a referendum on President Obama, and a victory for Hoffman would put the brakes on health care reform by making Democrats worry about challenges to their re-elections in 2010. As a Hoffman victory became more and more remote, the rhetoric changed. The message became the message of two weeks ago. This election wasn’t about showing Republicans that conservatives could win. It was about showing Republicans that they couldn’t win without conservatives.
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
|
|
The Message
|
|
Posted by:
Carol Platt Liebau at
12:44 PM
|
It will be interesting to watch the 80 Democrat congressmen from the districts that McCain won last year -- just how far will they be willing to walk the plank for Obamacare, given that the president couldn't save Jon Corzine, who outspent his opponent 5:1 in a deep blue state like New Jersey?
As Politico points out, most people polled say that they weren't voting specifically for or against the President. Fair enough. But before anyone reads too much into that, consider the fact that it's still a bit "politically incorrect" to be "against" Barack Obama; that's why everyone still insists to pollsters they like him and that their vote isn't about him, even as they vote against politicians who share his agenda.
Finally, consider the magnitude of the vote shifts between last year and this. The 20-point swing in New Jersey and Bob McDonnell's comfortable victory in Virginia -- just four years after barely squeaking in -- has a lot to say about the reasons for Obama's victory last year. And they have nothing to do with a new left tilt in the US.
First, there were a lot of people who were tired of George Bush, ready for a change, and disgruntled by the war. Second, John McCain was a lackluster candidate, who didn't have the enthusiastic support of his own party's base. Third, lots of people (especially the young) were interested in "making history" -- without much consideration of Obama's ideology. And that latter factor worked perfectly for the President -- whether by design or because he simply lacked details (or both), he kept his pitch largely agenda- and ideology-free, and the press let him get away with it.
Now the pendulum is swinging the other way. Nervous Democrat congressmen must be realizing that a fuzzy fog of Obamania can't save them from their voters if they ignore the electorate's wishes. And that's as it should be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Blog Postings:
|
|
Last updated 21 Minutes 5 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 23 Minutes 27 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 54 Minutes 21 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 1 Hours 17 Minutes 43 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 1 Hours 24 Minutes 13 Seconds Ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
Comments Comments
•Goodbye
Re:
The Undecideds
By
Kenny Z
•Oh and speed
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
L.J.
•More lies from the libs
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
Patrice
•Jo Anne
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Eugene
•The cowards are hiding
Re:
Health Care Vote Looms: Where Does Your Rep. Stand?
By
Patrice
•From the Update CBO Estimate>>
Re:
CBO: PelosiCare Cost Estimate = $3 Trillion Over 10 Years
By
Sky Pete
•Rockin Ronna Babe
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
L.J.
•excellent presentation, david
Re:
Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
By
dreadnaught
•Yes indeed! Go 'cuda, go!
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Jo Ann
•How the hell...
Re:
The Undecideds
By
Eugene
•Careful Because You Are My Biiiatch Axe
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
Eugene
•My letter to congress - pass it along!
Re:
2,000 Pages of Mandates, Taxes, and Bureaucracy
By
Teresa
•Vote NO
Re:
Just Vote No
By
Kenny Z
•Jo Anne
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Eugene
•peacefrog
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Eugene
•Ladybug Sarah flyaway home .....
Re:
Health Care Throwdown: Palin vs. Pelosi
By
Jo Ann
•Originalist
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
Ronna
•David...In Auschwitz Axie's Tiny Brain
Re:
Maine vote repeals gay marriage law
By
NeoConScum
•LJ
Re:
Pelosi: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
By
Speedicut
•Neo
Re:
Dem Leader Hoyer: We'll have the votes by this evening
By
Eugene
|
|
|
|
The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|