NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Friday, November 02, 2007
Matt Barber :: Townhall.com Columnist
Homosexuality: What’s all the Fuss?
by Matt Barber
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
 
Poll
Do you think the President's plan to freeze interest rates on some sub prime mortgages will be successful?

My 19 year-old brother, Jared, recently shared his thoughts in a brief essay on today’s politically correct, post-modern concept of “tolerance.” I’m admittedly biased, but I thought he exhibited insight beyond his years. He did, however, open the door for a debate on whether Christians focus too much attention on the sin of homosexuality while giving other sins a pass. His musings and my response follow:

Tolerance?
Jared Barber

“Certain things, if not seen as lovely or detestable, are not being correctly seen at all.” – C.S. Lewis

It has become difficult to hold true to strongly held beliefs. The problem lies in the fact that behaviors, once held simply as sinful actions, are being lauded as definers of identity.

So, when one states that one believes fornication, homosexual behavior, or adultery to be wrong, the modern world calls this person an “intolerant” “oppressor” of “sexual freedom.” Or they are called “hateful.” The rationale is that they are oppressing “the way people love.” Sexual behaviors, in particular homosexuality, are called “identity.” “This is who we are.”

This is a problem, grave and immense. This rationale seeks, in its innermost, to undermine the ability of others to challenge these beliefs. By setting themselves up as minorities, people in this realm make disagreement “hatred,” “bigotry,” “judgment.”

In reality, it is statement of fact. Morality is what it is. To attempt to rationalize it away is lunacy.

Another problem arises here, though; and it is this: Christians, as a whole, focus too much on the homosexual issue alone. They attack it solely, denounce it, and live whichever way they please. Adultery, fornication, racism, pride, jealousy, selfish ambition, drunkenness; all of these immoral acts take to the background in view of homosexuality, and so we as Christians are set up as anti-gay instead of anti-immorality. We need to end our own hypocrisy, all of us, I as much as any, so that we can more blamelessly broach this subject and others.

And foremost, we must remember that Christ preached one thing above all else: Love. We must love others, with, as [C.S.] Lewis said, “...a real and costly love, with deep feeling for the sins in spite of which we love the sinner — no mere tolerance, or indulgence which parodies love as flippancy parodies merriment.” We must hold to the standard of morality which binds all mankind. We must not allow behaviors to define identity. We must do away with “tolerance” in its modern form which simply indulges behavior despite what morality says. But above all else, we must love.

To which I replied:

Incisive analysis, Jared. Nicely done. I think C.S. Lewis himself might have said so. The only sentiment with which I take issue is this: “Christians, as a whole, focus too much on the homosexual issue alone.”

Here’s why I disagree. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
J. Matt Barber is Director of Cultural Affairs with Liberty Counsel and also serves as Associate Dean with Liberty University School of Law.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: you've said enough
The only source of truth is the Bible...alrighty then.
Good luck with that.

du -but if you will not, that is enough.


du writes: “If I want to understand the Christian mind, you're not even the last person I'd go to.”


Why would you want to understand the “Christian mind” in the first place, what purpose would that serve?


Why not try to understand God’s Word in the Bible instead?


That’s far more important than understanding any particular Christian’s mind…



~~~



du writes: “I know how to find what I need when I want to learn something.”


If that is actually true, then the problem is what you want (or don’t want) to learn...



~~~



du writes: “Are you sure I know what you want me to?”


I don’t even know what that last sentence meant, du.


So your ‘secrets’ are secure! ;-)



~~~



du writes: “You're quite satisfied that you're a qualfied rabbe for the purpose?”


If you mean “Rabbi”, Christians don’t wear “titles” like “Rabbi”.


We are instructed not to wear such titles:

“But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, [even] Christ; and all ye are brethren.” (Matthew 23:8, KJV)


I am satisfied that I’m able to point you to the only source of truth that matters, and that is God’s Word in the Bible.


I would gladly help you more if you would only let me, but if you will not, that is enough.

Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State:
*
Zip:
*
Phone:
      
Keep up-to-date with your local KNUS community.
Your daily must-read of conservative columns, cartoons and news. Coulter, Sowell, Krauthammer and more.
(Bi-Weekly) We highlight the best opportunities from our partners for surveys, action items and more.