NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Sunday, September 09, 2007
Robert Bluey :: Townhall.com Columnist
Education Reform Goes From Bad to Worse
by Robert Bluey
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Do you think the President's plan to freeze interest rates on some sub prime mortgages will be successful?

No Child Left Behind has seen better days. Under attack from both the right and left, President Bush’s signature education achievement might not survive if some members of Congress get their way.

House Education and Labor Chairman George Miller (D-Calif.) offered a 435-page legislative draft last month that rewrites several provisions and guts the few measures in the law that limited-government conservatives support.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) wants to go one step further and rename the law to something other than No Child Left Behind.

So not only does the Bush administration face the prospect of significant policy changes, it could also lose the marketing appeal of the law’s name.

Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, who last week fought back against the proposed changes, might be better off with the status quo than trying to reauthorize the law in a hostile Congress. Her biggest gripe was Miller’s attempt to water down the penalties schools face for failing to live up to the law’s testing requirements, but it’s just one of many differences that need to be addressed.

Meanwhile, conservatives who are seeking to trim government bureaucracy, end ineffective programs and restore state and local control in education won’t find much to like in Miller’s 435-page draft. His other changes include new regulations, more programs and fewer options for school choice. Miller has also made no attempt to fix No Child Left Behind’s structural problems.

Changes to the school-choice provisions are particularly troublesome given the large number of congressmen who support private schools in their personal life. A report from The Heritage Foundation last week revealed members of Congress send their kids to private schools at a rate nearly four times that of the general population.

Two notable examples are Sens. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.). But they’re not alone. More than 37 percent of House members and 45 percent of senators have sent their children to private school. Meanwhile, 52 percent of Congressional Black Caucus members and 38 percent of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus have had at least one child in private school. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Robert B. Bluey is director of the Center for Media & Public Policy at The Heritage Foundation and maintains a blog at RobertBluey.com
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: This all
starts at home. I think back to when I was a kid and I know very well if I had started screwing up in school my dad would have worn me out! I still remember him helping me learn to read and telling me the most important thing I'd ever get is an education. He meant this as he was self taught and only had a 5th grade education. On the other hand, this man taught himself to do tool and die work, jig and fixture work, R & D Welding, carpentry, masonery and a lot of other work. He grew up in the great depression and knew that one had to know as many skills as possible to survive.

don't throw money at the schools
Right money doesn't matter!

If you think this, think about sending your kid
to school in one of the 20 countries who spend
the least per capita in the world on education compared to the 20 countries who spend the most.
Nuff said. There is not a perfect correlation
for instance the US is not #2 in the world in
outcomes, but neither is it #159. And #159 is
certainly not in the top 20.

An excellent video[s] that reflect this can be found here:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/wideangle/shows/school2/video.html

It seems as though many of you are having trouble
with reading comprehension - I'm suggesting
raising teacher pay. This need not lead to
overall spending increases since one could cut
back in other areas. IF you read the report you
will also see that retention rules would be
redefined.

So, DON'T THROW MONEY AT THE SCHOOLS, THROW IT AT
THE TEACHERS. For instance, let's take
Cleveland, please!, if there $ per student is
20% more than the suburbs I bet dollars to donuts that their teachers are paid nowhere near 20%
more than those same suburban teachers. They
might even be paid less!
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*
Nickname:
*
Note: Nick name will be shown when you post comments.
Address 1:
*
Address 2:
City:
*
State: